Feature #2296
Adding RPORTS to scanner modules
| Status: | New | Start date: | 07/24/2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | Tod Beardsley | % Done: | 0% |
|
| Category: | general | |||
| Target version: | - | |||
| Resolution: | How To Use: | |||
| Release Note: |
Description
We have RHOSTS...why not RPORTS 
This is more or less a proof of concept (there are other modules that could make use of this)...though it does work nicely as far as I can tell...
I had to separate the run into do_host from run_host so that if something bombed with a host/port combo (connection refused), I could either move on (by re-raising the exception) or skip the host (connection timeout, no route to host (there are probably others that should be here).
History
Updated by Thomas Ring over 1 year ago
Bleh...lets try that again...
I could either move on by re-raising the exception (connection timeout, no route to host (there should probably be others here)) or by silently ignoring it so it tries next port (connection refused).
Updated by Thomas Ring over 1 year ago
- File tnslsnr_version.rb added
(&#(*&%#%*%&!!!
Attached wrong copy...correct copy attached...my bad.
Updated by Tod Beardsley over 1 year ago
- Category set to general
- Assignee set to Tod Beardsley
Most scanners presume that a RST or other connection fail is the end of the show, but this shouldn't be too hard to implement.
Updated by Thomas Ring over 1 year ago
Yes that would be true if only checking one port on one system; however, if you are checking say ports 1521-1526 on a system...just because 1521 isn't listening, doesn't mean a later port isn't...so you would want continue on checking the other ports rather than skipping the entire host.